Reported by Professor Maimunah Aminuddin & Sdr.
Cham Kok Soon
In conjunction with the
Engineering Week 2003, G&S Section, together with the Engineering
Week 2003 Committee had co-organized a talk on “Employment Law:
Employees’ & Employers’ Rights”. The talk was held on 18 March
2003 at the IEM. The speaker for the talk was Professor Maimunah
Aminuddin, currently a lecturer in the Faculty of Business
Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam. She has been
lecturing for 30 years and is also the author of more than 7 books
on topics relating to industrial relations, employment law and
human resource management. 31 participants attended the talk.
The talk kicked off 10
minutes late from the scheduled 5.30 p.m., due to heavy rain and
traffic congestion. As the participants gradually arrived, Sdr.
Kok Hee Poh had to initiate the talk by welcoming the
participants. He then introduced the speaker, Professor Maimunah
to the participants.
From there, Professor
Maimunah greeted the participants and wasted no time in getting
into the topic. According to her, in Malaysia, there are many laws
related to employment. However, the following are the major laws
regulating the employment relationship:
1.
The Employment Act, 1955;
2.
The Employees Provident Fund Act, 1991;
3.
The Employees Social Security Act, 1969;
4.
The Industrial Relations Act, 1967.
Although the mentioned
laws are significant in providing protection to both employers and
employees, not all employees are within the scope of all of these
acts. The Employment Act only protects employees who earn not more
than RM 1,500 per month and who are working in Peninsular Malaysia
in the private sector. The Employees Provident Fund Act provides a
compulsory saving scheme for all employees throughout the country
working in the private sector. The Employees Social Security Act
establishes a scheme for compensating employees who have a
work-related accident or contract a work-related illness. However,
while only employees who earn not more than RM 2,000 are required
to become members of the scheme, the Organization implements the
“once in, always in” concept. The Industrial Relations Act applies
to all employees in the private sector and provides a mechanism
for protecting employees’ security of employment.
As mentioned earlier, she reminded those preset
that employees who earn more than RM1500 a month ( with a few
exceptions) are not protected by the Employment Act. Therefore,
the rights of these groups fall within the four walls of the
employment contract. The terms should be expressly included in a
letter of appointment, a company handbook or similar document
specifically referred to in the letter of appointment. Employees
have no right to any other benefit other than those specified in
the contract. However, certain rights and obligations may be
implied into the contract, as they are into all employment
contracts, but it is rare in Malaysia for benefits to be implied
into a contract by practice or by any other means.
While explaining, she reminded employees
accepting job offers to read the letter of appointment very
carefully before signing acceptance of the terms and conditions of
employment. It is crucial not only to examine what is included,
but also what is not incorporated! Among the important items for
any person contemplating a job offer to check are as follows:
-
The duration of the contract, whether
temporary or permanent;
-
The wages and benefits offered;
-
Whether there are any other forms of monetary
remuneration such as bonus or allowances, and if so what are the
conditions for receiving these;
-
The hours of work;
-
Whether there is a probationary period, and
if so, for how long;
-
Notice required before termination of
employment;
-
Whether there is a mobility clause;
-
Whether a retirement age is incorporated into
the contract; and
-
Whether the employee’s right to be involved
in other work, whether for remuneration or on a voluntary basis
is prohibited or restricted.
On termination of service, Professor Maimunah
explained that while employers in Malaysia have the right to hire
as they please, they do not have the same freedom to sack
employees. The Industrial Relations Act, 1967, which protects all
employees in the private sector, provides a procedure whereby any
employee who has had his employment contract terminated, for
whatever reason, can make a claim of unfair dismissal at the
nearest Department of Industrial Relations, Ministry of Human
Resources. A conciliation meeting will be held to determine
whether a settlement can be reached between the employer and his
ex-employee. If re-conciliation is not successful, the dispute
will generally be referred to the Industrial Court for
arbitration.
Nevertheless, employers have the right to
terminate an employee’s contract in certain circumstances,
providing they follow a fair procedure prior to the termination.
Employers can retrench employees, or dismiss them for poor
performance or misconduct as elaborated below:
Retrenchment
An employer may downsize his workforce when
there are cogent business reasons for doing so. He is expected to
avoid retrenchment if at all possible. For example, a voluntary
separation scheme may be introduced to reduce the numbers of
workers employed, a hiring freeze could be instituted, cost saving
measures initiated and so on. If retrenchment cannot be avoided,
the choice of workers to be removed from the payroll must be done
in an objective manner. The Industrial Court frowns upon any
criteria other than “last in, first out” (LIFO). Employees should
be given adequate notice before they are retrenched and, where
appropriate, retrenchment benefits should be paid. Employees who
are not within the scope of the Employment Act will not be
entitled to retrenchment benefits unless their personal contract
specifically includes such a provision – which is unlikely.
Poor
Performance
If an employee’s work is not reaching an
acceptable standard, as defined by the employer, the latter has
the right to terminate the employee’s contract. Before
termination, however, the employee should be given a written
warning which outlines his deficiencies; he should be given
adequate time to improve and he should be given assistance to
improve. If, after such measures have been taken, the employee
still does not meet the work standards required, he may be
dismissed.
Misconduct
Any employee found guilty of a major misconduct
may be dismissed. Any act of misbehavior which is minor should be
dealt with by way of an alternative, and lesser, punishment.
Before dismissing an employee for misconduct, an employer should
investigate the alleged act of misconduct thoroughly and hold a
formal domestic inquiry to give the employee an opportunity to
defend himself.
By 6.50 p.m., Professor
Maimunah almost completed the talk. She then opened the talk to
the Q&A session of which she managed to answer a string of
questions from curious participants. By 7.10 p.m., Sdr. Kok Hee
Poh invited Ir. Chong P.E. for a short speech. Ir. Chong praised
the speaker for her interesting talk. He also thanked the speaker
for conducting the talk. Finally, he presented a token of
appreciation to Professor Maimunah on IEM’s behalf. The talk
effectively ended at 7.15 p.m.
The G&S Section and IEM also wish to thank Professor Maimunah for
conducting an informative and successful talk.
|